[Grok-dev] towards a Grok release: current state of affairs

[Jan-Wijbrand Kolman]

On 1/6/11 17:01 PM, Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
>> I'm in favor of 2), to preserve the compatibility. I think in the case
>> that someone really wants to extract a reusable library, they can go
>> all-Fanstatic themselves. It's also Grok's job to automate registration
>> tasks, and I think this includes Fanstatic registration tasks. I think
>> it's okay for grokcore.view to rely on Fanstatic. Can we drop the
>> dependency on zope.browserresource when we do that?
>
>> From a grok perspective it makes sense to 'grok' the registration.
> I'll work on the grokker.

Cool.

regards, jw