[ZODB-Dev] StandaloneZODB future plans

[Jeremy Hylton]

>>>>> "GW" == Greg Ward <gward@mems-exchange.org> writes:

  GW> On 07 June 2002, Jeremy Hylton said:
  >> We plan to change the name and version number for this release.
  >> We're going to call it ZODB 3.0.  We like this name better
  >> because the "Standalone" part isn't really important.  We like
  >> the version number better because it really is the 3.0 version of
  >> the persistence / object database code.

  GW> *splutter* but didn't Jim's paper from IPC9?8? refer to ZODB
  GW> 3.0?!?  This is really going to confuse things!

Would it be better if we called it 3.1?  The ZODB architecture that
Jim described in his paper is still used.  What would be the
confusion?

Jeremy