[ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] PROPOSAL: ZODB Relationships

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 12:24 PM 5/9/03 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:

>True.  We're still tinkering with terminology.  Each call to the 
>Relationship() constructor names a distinct relationship set.

Why?  What good is that?


>   (Oops, I guess the examples in the proposal don't make it possible for 
> a Relationship to know its name.)

Why do they need to?


>   Currently there is no connection between relationship sets, other than 
> being stored in the same repository.

What's a relationship "set", and what value does it add?