[ZODB-Dev] Re: Should we require windows users to use tools that honor Unix lineendings? (Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] ATTENTION! cvs to subversiontransitiontomorrow)

[Lennart Regebro]

From: "Jim Fulton" <jim at zope.com>
> I found this to be so unbelievable, that I had to resoearch it myself.
[...]
> unbelievable, I couldn't help it.

> > I think we'll have to develop a standard set of config file settings
like
> > that for committers to add to their personal svn configs --

Eh. WHAT!?! OK, that there are settings like these, but aren't they
configured on the server?
They are CLIENT side? That is very weird.

> I think the "real" answer, the answer that the svn (and arch) developers
believe
> in the heart of hearts is that windows users should be using tools that
understand,
> well, understand and always produce Unix line endings.

Well, but that is also a setting that needs to be handled.
I use TextPad which conserves line endings. But when I create a new file, it
would typically save it with windows endings, unless I say so..

> Is it practical to require windows users to use tools that understand and
produce
> Unix line endings?

Maybe more practical than forcing them to have specific SVN settings, but
only slightly so...

> I suppose it could.  I think that a post-commit script could inspect new
files and,
> for any new file that has no mine-type property, or has one with a text
type,
> set the svn:eol-style proprty to native. It would have to do this in a
separate
> transaction.

I think this is the only possible solution...