[ZODB-Dev] Use of fsync in FileStorage
Jens Vagelpohl
jens at dataflake.org
Fri Jul 30 01:30:27 EDT 2004
> I'm most interested in the first kind of system, "server-class"
> configurations. Serious users with heavy loads run those, and they
> probably
> have the most to lose if the database goes bad. If it's generally
> true that
> fsyncs really don't hurt them much, that makes a tempting default.
>
> If possible, I'd like to see some timings from the kinds of boxes you
> run in
> production. I'd also like to know whether an option to run with *no*
> fsyncs
> would be interesting to you. You should answer that last one twice:
> once
> before running timings, then again after <wink>.
Tim, maybe you can ask Andrew to run this on the boxes that are being
used as storages in the cluster. I know that with the version of ZEO we
are using the busiest storages were already totally I/O-bound and
adding more I/O load would be highly problematic. We had many instances
where the cluster as a whole started to slow down because the storage
box became too busy, and you can imagine that that's a recipe for
disaster...
jens
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list