[ZODB-Dev] Recovering from a POSkeyerror
Tim Peters
tim at zope.com
Thu Jan 13 15:36:03 EST 2005
[Paulo Eduardo Neves]
> Hi, I'm somewhat desperade, maybe someone here can help me.
I hope so (but it probably won't be me).
This is worth reading:
http://zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/FileStorageBackup
> I'm trying to recover from a POSkeyerror in a ZClass. I'm still using
> Zope 2.6.4
>
> I have the ZClass instances working fine, but when I go to this URL in
> the management web interface:
>
> /Control_Panel/Products/Comentario/ComentarioClass/
>
> I get the POSkeyerror
>
> I've read the tips in http://www.zopelabs.com/cookbook/1054240694
>
> The problem is that I can't find the problem object.
>
> obj =
root.unrestrictedTraverse("Control_Panel/Products/Comentario/ComentarioClass
")
>
> obj.objectItems() is empty if I try with the parent folder, I can access
> all objects without an POSKeyError
>
> Can anyone help me to find the corrupted object?
There's a long comment at the bottom of the page you referenced, starting
with "If you don't have a clue where to start looking for the broken
object(s) ...". Maybe that will help.
> It looks like there's some kind of ZClass magic in there.
The number of people who *could* help gets cut by a factor of ten with each
new sentence <wink>.
> When I run fsfrefs.py I get the following output:
>
> oid 0x324ff failed to load
> oid 0x32500 failed to load
> oid 0x32506 failed to load
> oid 0x32507 failed to load
> oid 0x3250a failed to load
> oid 0x3250b failed to load
> oid 0x32510 failed to load
> oid 0x32511 failed to load
> oid 0x32514 failed to load
> oid 0x32515 failed to load
> oid 0x32516 failed to load
> oid 0x32517 failed to load
> oid 0x32518 failed to load
> oid 0x32519 failed to load
> oid 0x3251a failed to load
> oid 0x3251b failed to load
> oid 0x3251c failed to load
> oid 0x3251d failed to load
> oid 0x3251e failed to load
> oid 0x330df failed to load
Run fsrefs.py with -v and it will show tracebacks associated with the load
failures (see the link I gave above). Download ZODB 3.2.4 (the current
stable release) and use its fsrefs.py, and I bet a bunch of those complaints
will go away (the reasons why were discussed here (on zodb-dev) over the
last week -- look at the archives).
Note that fsrefs.py doesn't know anything about versions, so if your
POSKeyError is coming from an object in a version, fsrefs.py won't be able
to find the problem.
The POSKeyError exception you got should have contained the oid (object id)
of the missing object. You can use fsdump.py (see the link I gave above) to
get a semi-readable text dump of your .fs file, and search for that oid in
the dump for more clues.
> It looks like I have the problem in more than one object.:-(
Not necessarily. The version of fsrefs.py you're using can produce the
messages you're seeing for objects whose creation has merely been undone,
which isn't actually a problem in isolation. The current ZODB's fsrefs.py
is better-behaved in this case.
The real mystery here so far is why you're *only* seeing "failed to load"
messages. That's not the same as a POSKeyError, although it would be much
easier (for me <wink>) if you tried a current fsrefs.py than to try to
explain all that can go wrong with the fsrefs.py you're using.
The only likely scenario I have in mind is that one of your active objects
refers to an object whose creation has been undone. If so, a current
fsrefs.py should produce a much clearer message about that.
> I also don't know how to discover the parent folder of an object having
> the oid.
>
> Would upgrade to 2.7 help me?
It won't fix any pre-existing .fs problems, no. There have been many
bugfixes to Zope, ZODB and ZEO since Zope 2.6.4, and upgrading to a current
release would prevent some kinds of problems you're vulnerable to so long as
you stick with 2.6.4 (note that Zope 2.7.4 final should be released this
weekend).
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list