[ZODB-Dev] cache not minimized at transaction boundaries?

[Chris Withers]

Tim Peters wrote:
> [Chris Withers]
>> ...
>> ...oh well, if only the ZODB cache was RAM-usage-based ratehr than object
>> count based ;-)
> 
> Ya, that's not feasible.  More plausible would be to base ZODB cache targets
> on aggregate pickle size; ZODB _could_ know that, and then it would also be
> strongly related to how a ZEO cache's size is measured (the ZEO cache size
> limit is given in bytes, and by far the bulk of those bytes are consumed by
> pickles).

All good, but still never gonna happen, right? *wry grinz*

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk