[ZODB-Dev] packaging zodb in eggs.
Chris McDonough
chrism at plope.com
Thu Mar 2 23:16:17 EST 2006
On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:03 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>>
>> persistence-3.6.0.egg (which would include persistent and BTrees
>> modules).
>> zodblib-3.6.0.egg (which would include ZODB and ZODB packages).
>> transaction-3.6.0.egg (which would include only the transaction
>> package).
>> zconfig-2.3.1.egg (which would include only the ZConfig package).
>> zodb-3.6.0.egg (which might be an empty "dependency" package that
>> depended on persistence, transaction, zodblib, and zconfig).
>>
>> Anyone care?
>
> First, "rah rah!".
>
> Second, zodblib seems unlikely to be useful alone, but maybe I'm
> wrong, and even if I'm right there's precedent for that sort of
> thing in packaging land, so what the hey.
Well, I'm only an egg, as Michael Valentine would say, so I'm not
sure what the right thing is.
>
> Third, I'd guess that zodb would contain the stitching for zconfig-
> to-zodb. It makes me wonder if a zodb-without-zconfig egg would be
> feasible/useful, but that's probably for later navel-staring.
Yeah, that'd be good. It's currently pretty dense in there.
- C
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list