[ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Bug] ZODB invalidation processing

[Joachim Schmitz]

>>
>> Any suggestion for a temporary fix would be very welcome, since we get 
>> about 6000 conflict errors per day now about 15 % unresolved, and they 
>> are really killing our portal.
> 
> A workaround might be to replace the DateIndexes for 'created' and
> 'modified' with FieldIndexes:  you will see a big jump in the number of
> keys in the index, but (perhaps) a reduction in conflicts (altheough
> there will be more bucket splits, which can also cause conflicts).
> 
Unfortunately that does not work the FieldIndex also gives an conflict-error
<FieldIndex at Date>
<Products.ZCatalog.Catalog.Catalog object at 0xb250a6ec>
<CatalogTool at portal_catalog>
<CPSDefaultSite at uniben>
<Application at >
{'Application': <Application at >, 'ZGlobals': <BTrees._OOBTree.OOBTree 
object at 0xb242989c>}
2007-06-01 20:23:41 INFO ZPublisher.Conflict ConflictError at 
/uniben/campus/students/A923157/study_course/create_level: database 
conflict error (oid 0x36c429, class BTrees._OOBTree.OOBTree, serial this 
txn started with 0x036e0590d58661ee 2007-06-01 17:52:50.044906, serial 
currently committed 0x036e059346ef95dd 2007-06-01 17:55:16.625597) (1 
conflicts (0 unresolved) since startup at Fri Jun  1 19:54:43 2007)


> A longer term solution might be to come up with a derived index type
> which used non-persistent objects (rather than the IITreeSet used by
> UnIndex) for the set of RIDs stored under each 'minute':  you could then
> inspect the state and do more aggressive conflict resolution than the
> stock implementation allows (see my other post).

any other shortterm suggestions.
-- 
Gruß Joachim