[ZODB-Dev] PGStorage

[David Pratt]

Yes, Shane had done some benchmarking about a year or so ago. PGStorage 
was actually faster with small writes but slower for larger ones. As far 
as packing, as a zodb implementation, packing is still required to 
reduce the size of data in Postgres. BTW Stephan, where is Lovely using 
it - a site example? I had read some time ago that they were exploring 
it but not that it was being used.

Regards,
David

Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> "OracleStorage" was abandoned because it was almost an order
>> or magnitude slower than "FileStorage".
> 
> Actually, Lovely Systems uses PGStorage because it is faster for them.
> 
> Regards,
> Stephan