[ZODB-Dev] anecdotal speed comparison with RelStorage
Chris Withers
chris at simplistix.co.uk
Wed Mar 26 13:17:55 EDT 2008
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> FileStorage-over-ZEO managed the test in 3 mins 20 seconds
>>
>> Relatorage-to-Oracle managed the test in 3 mins 18 seconds
>
> Cool, although it's not clear the storage speed had a major impact.
Well, the point was that RelStorage-to-Oracle was of similar speed to
FileStorage-over-ZEO, meaning there are no performance reasons not to
head for the former.
> Oracle win. ;) I've seen evidence that RelStorage on MySQL even has a
> chance of beating plain FileStorage in performance.
Cool :-)
>> I'd be really interested to try some tests with multiple ZEO clients
>> attached to a FileStorage versus multiple RelStorage client attached
>> to Oracle. I suspect Oracle would win ;-)
>
> I am certainly interested in hearing the results of that test.
This might happen tomorrow, we'll see...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list