[ZODB-Dev] make ZODB as small and compact as expected

[Tres Seaver]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/22/2013 09:15 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
>>> BTrees
> I agree, this could be part of ZODB and it would be fine.

Splitting out BTrees was a conscious decision to serve two goals:

- - Allow evolving it (in particular, the work to port it to Py3k / PyPy)
  without stalling on the larger ZODB project.  For ongoing work, it is
  useful to be able to release a fix for a BTrees-only bug without needing
  to release ZODB.

- - Allow projects which use BTrees (as base classes or attributes) to be
  tested without needing to install all of ZODB.

I consider both of those concerns still important, and so am -1 on
re-absorbing BTrees into ZODB.


Tres.
- -- 
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlHtV3QACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6PeACeNW11cnoU7IxG37tkOhGxuRXU
RBEAmwXv+JD32emv2MFXaiAqmGcTj+Qt
=oWDa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----