<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Shane Hathaway <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:shane@hathawaymix.org">shane@hathawaymix.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Santi Camps wrote:<br>
> * Module relstorage.cache, line 294, in after_tpc_finish<br>
<div class="im">> * Module memcache, line 360, in incr<br>
> * Module memcache, line 384, in _incrdecr<br>
><br>
> ValueError: invalid literal for int(): NOT_FOUND<br>
<br>
</div>This means that in some circumstances, the memcache module you chose<br>
returns 'NOT_FOUND' when a cache entry is missing. That's broken<br>
behavior in the memcache module.<br>
<br>
Please try the pylibmc_wrapper module instead. I have found pylibmc to<br>
be not only faster but more reliable than the other memcache modules.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>But if I'm correct, pylibmc (0.9) required by RelStorage don't run with Python 2.4.x or I'm doing something wrong.<br><br>Cheers,<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Shane<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Rudá Porto Filgueiras<br><a href="http://python-blog.blogspot.com">http://python-blog.blogspot.com</a><br><a href="http://twitter.com/rudaporto">http://twitter.com/rudaporto</a><br>