[Zope-Checkins] CVS: Zope/lib/python/AccessControl/tests -
testUserFolder.py:1.5.6.4
Brian Lloyd
brian at zope.com
Fri Jan 30 11:59:02 EST 2004
Update of /cvs-repository/Zope/lib/python/AccessControl/tests
In directory cvs.zope.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18123/lib/python/AccessControl/tests
Modified Files:
Tag: Zope-2_6-branch
testUserFolder.py
Log Message:
fixed wrong test in testUserFolder
=== Zope/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py 1.5.6.3 => 1.5.6.4 ===
--- Zope/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py:1.5.6.3 Wed Jan 28 14:22:28 2004
+++ Zope/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py Fri Jan 30 11:59:01 2004
@@ -135,9 +135,16 @@
user = self.uf.validate(self.app.REQUEST, '', ['role1'])
self.assertEqual(user, None)
- def testNotValidateWithoutRoles(self):
+ def testValidateWithoutRoles(self):
+ # Note - calling uf.validate without specifying roles will cause
+ # the security machinery to determine the needed roles by looking
+ # at the object itself (or its container). I'm putting this note
+ # in to clarify because the original test expected failure but it
+ # really should have expected success, since the user and the
+ # object being checked both have the role 'role1', even though no
+ # roles are passed explicitly to the userfolder validate method.
user = self.uf.validate(self.app.REQUEST, self.basic)
- self.assertEqual(user, None)
+ self.assertEqual(user.getUserName(), 'user1')
def testNotValidateWithEmptyRoles(self):
user = self.uf.validate(self.app.REQUEST, self.basic, [])
More information about the Zope-Checkins
mailing list