[Zope-CMF] Sneak preview - workflow
Chris Withers
chrisw@nipltd.com
Tue, 22 May 2001 16:44:31 +0100
Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2001, seb bacon wrote:
>
> > DC should do whatever they need to do to keep profitable. If this
> > means closing off some of the CMF code, then so be it. I wouldn't
> > want DC to struggle because of the Open Source decision, and I'm
> > immensely grateful for what we've already been given.
>
> Gratitude goes a long way in my book.
Just in case I haven't said it recently, I am _extremely_ grateful for the work
DC have done for not only Zope and the CMF, but also the Python community :-)
> OSS is no longer an experiment for us. It has been proven to work. But
> for each new product we have to think about the greatest benefit to the
> company. DC weighs more than just concrete numbers in the decision,
> however, and that's why we almost always choose open source. Community
> means a lot to us.
Good to hear...
> Indeed. It can be hard to tell what's a core feature and what's not--but
> I think you're right, workflow is close to the core.
...especially given your comments below:
> I think pluggable, dynamic workflow is going to change the way products
> are written. It's parallel to the "new religion" Jim has been talking
> about.
>
> http://www.zope.org/Members/michel/Components/Components/NewReligion
>
> > In particular, what are the business requirements driving
> > the recent flurry of CMF improvements?
cheers,
Chris