[Zope-CMF] NuxUserGroups and CMF 1.3

[Florent Guillaume]

Really there's no reason at all to have an interaction between user
groups and expiration dates. These have nothing to do with one another.

It must be something else in your installation, I'd appreciate if you
have more info on that.

Florent

In article <005701c26a38$6812a380$0a01a8c0@stravinsky> you write:
> Florent,
> thanks for answering.
> After a rather frustrating day of stepping trough the guts of Zope I found a
> partial answer/solution.
> It looks that an installation with UserGroups does treat CMF-objects that
> have no effective/expires date set differently than an installation without
> it.
> With UserGroups installed no objects without these dates are found, and I
> have to give allow "Access inactive portal content" to users.
> 
> Why this is so I do not know. I will investigate things further.
> 
> Robert
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Florent Guillaume" <fg@nuxeo.com>
> To: <robert@redcor.ch>
> Cc: <zope-cmf@zope.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 6:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [Zope-CMF] NuxUserGroups and CMF 1.3
> 
> 
> > This is a bit vague. Can you be more specific? What's in the Security
> > tab of an object that should be shown but is not? What local roles? What
> > values did the catalog index for this object? What workflow are you
> > using? What are the workflow's permissions settings for "pending"?
> >
> > Florent
> >
> > In article <001901c269ed$3bac2be0$0a01a8c0@stravinsky> you write:
> > > I have the impression, that NuxUserGroups has a problem working with a
> > > CMF1.3/Plone base site.
> > > A script doing a portal_catalog search for review_state "pending" only
> > > returns any hits when the user has manager roles.
> > > Can anybody comment on that?
> > > Is there a remedy for it?


-- 
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)
+33 1 40 33 79 87  http://nuxeo.com  mailto:fg@nuxeo.com