[Zope-CMF] Re: folder_contents was Re: [dev] two small changes
yuppie
y.2004_ at wcm-solutions.de
Fri Feb 6 10:30:16 EST 2004
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
> The distinction between "navigation" and "actions" is not clear cut in
> mine. You have put your finger on the rationale for putting
> 'folder_contents' in the 'object' category for containers, but in the
> 'folder' category for non-containers: the UI can then do something
> different with the two categories, if desired. The actions tool has the
> two actions largely to allow the action to show up only once for folders.
The problem is: It's just the other way round. Containers have a
'folder/folderContents' Action, non-containers an
'object/folderContents' Action. So folderContents is always in the same
category as the other object Actions.
>>> Well. If you ask me the 'folder/edit' Action would be the right
>>> Action to manipulate folder contents. 'folder_edit_form' should be
>>> called by 'folder/metadata' or become part of 'folder_contents' (or
>>> 'folder_contents' part of 'folder_edit_form').
[...]
>
> Local policy again. :)
Yes. But I don't think it's wrong to discuss the policy choice of
CMFDefault.
> One feature I am contemplating for CMF 1.5 is a 'portal_configuration'
> tool which allows you to export all the tool settings to a directory /
> tarball, for migration / version control, etc. We actually have the
> beast built already; it just needs to be disentangled from the
> client-specific product it currently inhabits. At any rate, being able
> to export your "local policy" choices to a reproducible description
> should resolve most issues with the use of local policy knobs.
Great!
BTW: I'm still waiting for your draft roadmap for CMF 1.5 ;)
Cheers,
Yuppie
More information about the Zope-CMF
mailing list