[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] CMF 1.5 roadmap?

[Tres Seaver]

Stefane Fermigier wrote:

> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> 
>> | This is the version of PT that we intend to ship in CPS3.0 (it *is 
>> not* | included in CPS3.0rc3, since I did the CPS3.0rc3 release on 
>> sunday and | started hacking PT on monday).
>> | | Of course, the diffs will be sent to the PT maintainer if they 
>> want to | integrate them. But for us it is a question of moving on 
>> quickly.
>>
>> Sure we want it!
> 
> I'm not that sure. There are files, for instance, that are specific to 
> our testing framework. And it is not clear at this point that our code 
> could be released under another license than the GPL.

Stefane, I am not sure I understand you.  Are you claiming the right to 
block relicesnsing of AT under the ZPL if the AT team accept your 
changes?  I would assume that your changes would then be substantive 
enough to create "copyrightbale interest" in the derived work.  Does 
Nuxeo have a policy of not contributing bugfixes or enhancements to 
ZPL-licenced code?  I certainly was not under that impression;  in fact 
I don't believe that such a position is consistent with the current fact 
that Nuxeo employees have Zope.org CVS access.

Just to reiterate for clarity:  relicensing under the ZPL is an absolute 
prerequisite to importing AT into the cvs.zope.org repository, which is 
then itself a prerequisite for inclusion in the CMF.  We will need a 
clean, auditable statement of provenance from everyone who has copyright 
interest in the code-to-be-imported, or we can't move forward.

Tres.
-- 
===============================================================
Tres Seaver                                tseaver at zope.com
Zope Corporation      "Zope Dealers"       http://www.zope.com