[Zope-CMF] Re: Re: [Plone-users] Date based snapshots
Toby Dickenson
tdickenson at geminidataloggers.com
Fri May 7 04:56:01 EDT 2004
On Friday 07 May 2004 09:42, Chris Withers wrote:
> > There is a low level filesystem
> > abstraction that will need to be implemented using NTFS semantics.
>
> Or FAT?
I suspect that would be harder if you wanted strong guarantees about data
loss. (alternatively, everything is much easier if you dont.)
> Hmmm... now i guess the question you may not want to asnwer...
> where do I find out what those are?
Im sure the answer is in msdn somewhere.
> > 2. Some of the peripheral tools might make some light unix assumptions,
> > but Im sure they are all fixable except.....
>
> OK.
>
> > 3. The replication tool is unix-heavy. it uses fork and exec.
>
> Surely those have Windows counterparts?
Replication isnt a large body of code. If was porting this to win32 I would
probably restructure it. Its doable, but more in-depth than all the other
tasks put together.
--
Toby Dickenson
More information about the Zope-CMF
mailing list