[Zope-CMF] Re: Pacefull vs Placeless

[Julien Anguenot]

Hi Alex,

We have the Placeful workflows within CPS3. It's a fairly easy 
implementation actually.

http://cvs.nuxeo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/CPS3/CPSCore/CPSWorkflowConfiguration.py?rev=1.10&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup

+ a small hook on the getChainsFor() of the workflow tool.

The code can be backported easily to Plone.

Maybe it could be interesting to add this within the CMF ?

	J.


Alexander Limi asy wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 16:12:16 +0200, Jean-Marc Orliaguet  
> <jmo-tTo+xxYJ+kmv1QaEFLkzfg at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> igguratio
>> Is there any difference between what you describe and CPS's placeful  
>> workflows?, i.e. basically that they apply to a folder and to all  
>> subfolders (for local workflow chains) or only to sub-folders for 
>> 'below  workflow chains'.
>>
>> If not, I think that it would be a good idea not to introduce yet  
>> another name if the concept is exactly the same.
>>
>> see: http://www.medic.chalmers.se/~jmo/CPS/placeful_workflow_cps.png
> 
> 
> I also think we should cooperate with CPS, if possible - and reuse code  
> between the two platforms. If CPS already has this, they've taken the 
> time  to work out the issues along the way, and I think it's a good 
> thing to  share between the two platforms. I believe Julien from Nuxeo 
> was  interested in this too.
> 

-- 
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo (Paris, France)
mail: anguenot at nuxeo.com; tel: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66