[Plone-developers] [Zope-CMF] Re: Pacefull vs Placeless

[Julien Anguenot]

>> I had already contemplated adding something on a per-instance basis; 
>> making it "placeful" wouldn't be any harder.
> 
> 
> +1 to this approach.  while containment-based workflow specification 
> would, i'm sure, be a popular use-case, it's hardly the only one.  if 
> it's not too difficult to allow other mechanisms for associating 
> instances with workflows, let's allow for that flexibility.
> 

This sounds really interesting. +10

I would like to see that.

	J.

> -r
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF at lists.zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
> 
> See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Plone-developers mailing list
> Plone-developers at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
> 

-- 
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo (Paris, France)
mail: anguenot at nuxeo.com; tel: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66