[Zope-CMF] Re: modifying TypeInformation's properties
Florent Guillaume
fg at nuxeo.com
Fri Sep 3 11:04:04 EDT 2004
> Maybe special kinds of types should have their own Type Information
> class?
Why ? The TypeInformation classes are implementation details about the
type. The should not constrain how the TI is used, and should be
interchangeable.
> Factory-based Type Information and Scriptable Type Information
> are made for ordinary content types.
I don't know what you mean by that. They are made to construct CMF types.
> In general, I'd like to see a discussion about questions like these:
>
> - Do we need more or less configuration options in the type info
> objects? See <http://collector.zope.org/CMF/33> for a proposal to remove
> "allow discussion" configuration from type infos.
#33 specifically talks about UI, not where the info is stored.
I'm not aware of anyone apart from you advocating moving that info
somewhere else from the TI.
> - Is the current default schema up to date, or should some fields be
> added / modified?
>
> - If we allow to add arbitrary fields to FTIs and STIs, how do
> components play together? Are the content types responsible for setting
> these values or the components that use these fields?
Just see them as annotations. Those who care about them will set them
and check them.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com mailto:fg at nuxeo.com
More information about the Zope-CMF
mailing list