[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone participation in the CMF list
Tres Seaver
tseaver at palladion.com
Tue Aug 2 10:43:41 EDT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
>
>>I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up
>>stalled over the question of whether to "code generation" design
>>should be preferred over "configuration-based" design (as found in
>>CPSSchemas, for instance).
>
>
> Also now that Zope 3 is taking more and more importance in CMF, any
> schema-based solution should be based on Zope 3 schemas. IMO both
> Archetypes and CPSSchemas are too big frameworks to include in CMF.
+1, as long as that doesn't mean slavish adherence to the "all schemas
must be defined as interfaces in Python code" model prevalent today in Z3.
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC74ad+gerLs4ltQ4RAtkpAJ0TTXObeMsj3KFNCFDvhbGQsHnQVACfU47g
HKVJ5ZkgC7X7Z7cW5ASKgig=
=z0hZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-CMF
mailing list