[Zope-CMF] Re: Some first steps with CMF2

Jens Vagelpohl jens at dataflake.org
Tue Feb 28 18:48:25 EST 2006


I'm afraid integrating a separate product at the last minute is not  
in the cards. We're in beta, and that means feature freeze. One way  
of achieving what you want, if missing code is indeed the problem,  
would be to write a addon Zope product which provides the missing  
pieces. That can be done independent of the CMF roadmap, which you  
can find here:

http://www.zope.org/Products/CMF/docs/roadmap/view

jens


On 28 Feb 2006, at 22:38, David Pratt wrote:

> Hi Yuppie. Is there some interest in having CPSSkins V3 work  
> together with CMF in the new release? The CMF on its own is still  
> very nice framework but it would be nice if it was usable with a  
> new skin. CPSSkins V3 is ZPL. The old default templates are really  
> not pretty but CPSSkins could give CMF on its own a new life don't  
> you think? What it is missing is a Five bridge. Is this something  
> that we could make happen. I am willing to help (but my ZCML  
> knowledge is not particularly  great at this stage). I am not sure  
> when the final CMF 2.0.0 but it would be a real milestone if we  
> could give CMF a new exterior for it's debut as 2.0.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> David Pratt wrote:
>> Hi Yuppie.  Many thanks for this help. Yikes with the profiles.  
>> Not sure which way I will go. I'll wait for Rocky on 2.9  
>> pythonproducts which will hopefull be shortly. I was hoping the  
>> Z3ECM CPSSkins could be used with CMF Default so that views could  
>> be integrated into something good and new. CPSSkins is ZPL. I  
>> guess formlib will be a bit so I should not be so anxious. It all  
>> takes time. :-)
>> Regards,
>> David
>> yuppie wrote:
>>> Hi David!
>>>
>>>
>>> David Pratt wrote:
>>>
>>>> My first question has to do with GenericSetup. I have portals  
>>>> that require the adding of a variety of tools etc. So first off  
>>>> how/where do I create my site configuration so that I can create  
>>>> clones with my own configuration instead of default?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In general it should be easier to customize a site and create the  
>>> profile by exporting the site configuration compared to  
>>> customizing the XML files directly.
>>>
>>> A tarball import function is still missing, so the easiest way to  
>>> use your own profiles is creating a small product that registers  
>>> your profile.
>>>
>>> There are two possible strategies for creating your profiles:
>>>
>>> 1.) Create your own base profile(s)
>>>
>>> pro: This is an automated process because exports are always base  
>>> profiles.
>>>
>>> con: You create a lot of redundant configuration data that will  
>>> become hard to maintain if the default profiles are changed or  
>>> you need many similar configurations.
>>>
>>> 2.) Create your own extension profile(s)
>>>
>>> pro: It just represents the difference to the base profile and  
>>> other extension profiles. Keeping track of changes in those  
>>> profiles is an automated process.
>>>
>>> con: While a diff helps you to identify changes between two  
>>> profiles creating an extension profile is manual work.
>>>
>>>> Second, does CMF now support products as a package instead? If  
>>>> so where are the packages to be located for CMF and is there  
>>>> some sort of code somewhere that would exemplify an approach for  
>>>> moving my own products forward.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It is not officially supported but it might work with the latest  
>>> Five / pythonproducts code. I haven't tried it so far.
>>>
>>>> I see that five views are now available for default types. This  
>>>> is very exciting. How would one deal with the main portal template?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The main_template is one of the oldest parts of the CMFDefault  
>>> skin. I guess it needs a major refactoring if we port it to five  
>>> views. For now you customize it the old way or make your own  
>>> experiments.
>>>
>>>> Last question has to do with formlib. Does this integration  
>>>> exist in CMF2 currently?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> CMF doesn't integrate Zope 3 features faster than Five. CMF 2.0  
>>> just requires Zope 2.9 (Five 1.3) which has no formlib support.  
>>> Maybe CMF 2.1 will use formlib and maybe you can already do  
>>> useful things with the latest Five code and formlib in CMF 2.0.
>>>
>>>> Sorry for so many questions but I am really pumped about the  
>>>> changes and I am anxious to begin moving things over.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You are welcome!
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>     Yuppie
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF at lists.zope.org
>> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
>> See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature  
>> requests
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF at lists.zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
>
> See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests



More information about the Zope-CMF mailing list