[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

[Jens Vagelpohl]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 10 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Rocky Burt wrote:
>> This sounds fine, but we'd probably want to wait until we have a CMF
>> version that does require 2.10, right? HEAD says Zope >= 2.9. Unless
>> we want to work with indirections that know how to do the right  
>> thing.
>
> I guess as far as the Plone community is concerned having CMF 2.1
> require Zope 2.10 would be no problem since the next release of Plone
> will require Zope 2.10.  Of course I'm not going to be naive enough to
> think just because it's ok for the Plone community it's good enough  
> for
> all other CMF consumers :)

Just out of curiosity, which dependencies does Plone 3.0 have that  
require Zope 2.10? Or was it some papal edict to use 2.10?

jens


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFBA2rRAx5nvEhZLIRAhMEAJ4gelM/yEyqJEYx4mJ3ozsTSOf8yACcCMqh
xlBPI4+Vt71pXyJp00zP5e4=
=xpPv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----