[Zope-CMF] Re: CMF 2.1 release schedule

[Jens Vagelpohl]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 11 Sep 2006, at 11:48, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> You guys should probably not take this as a show stopper for CMF  
> 2.1. I'm not at all into CMF development, but it seems most of the  
> items from the roadmap have indeed not been completed. So how is  
> CMF 2.1 different from CMF 2.0 now?

There are a few additions on the HEAD that I see by eyeballing a diff:

- - CMFActionIcons product now registered with a GS profile
- - ZClass support deprecated
- - a lot of GS registrations moved from __init__.py to configure.zcml
- - old Z2 interfaces removed
- - more manage_*-methods replaced with events
- - Z3 factories used for content
- - removal of BBB code deprecated in 1.5

Basically, a *lot* of cleanup, and a bunch of bugfixes. Tres got all  
mean on the collector a couple weeks ago ;)


>> Looking at http://www.zope.org/Products/CMF/docs/roadmap there are  
>> quite a few items we were hoping to get in that aren't finished yet.
>
> By the way, the roadmap has the Five version numbers wrong. See  
> http://codespeak.net/z3/five/INSTALL.html.

That's corrected now, it says Five 1.6/Zope 2.11.

I think the remaining question to all other stockholders (CMF  
developers, CPS developers) is whether it's OK to push some of the  
roadmap items out to 2.2. If that's OK then 2.1 doesn't have much  
left to do for it.

jens


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFBT0XRAx5nvEhZLIRAgo/AKCrTvT1SPrUvJtOMA3PWmfe7JLBeQCgjYXO
v2SQE8++ycRhjzc6YhlQ7GY=
=lgCT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----