[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

[Jens Vagelpohl]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 13 Sep 2006, at 13:06, Miles Waller wrote:
>> Personally, I'm neutral on moving the requirement for CMF 2.1 to  
>> Zope  2.10. Obviously we're not using any of those new features  
>> yet, but it  would be nice to enable their use by mandating 2.10.  
>> CMF 2.2 will  move the bar higher I'd wager.
>> I'd love to hear some kind of yay/nay for making Zope 2.10 the   
>> required platform for CMF 2.1 from some other people like Tres,  
>> Yvo,  Florent etc.
>
> One thing that would be good about this is that the CMFUid suite  
> could be deprecated in favour of an implementation based on zope3's  
> intids utility.
>
> There was a discussion a while back about the future of that  
> package: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2006-April/ 
> 024373.html

Yes, that would be a good thing, CMFUid isn't as "alive" as it was  
hoped when the product was pushed into the CMF.

jens


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFCQEbRAx5nvEhZLIRAugsAJ4pBxmqKlHdlMjiaiJSCVGLRsTIcQCfc7X2
DrrAhYmOiDB8CTbxITFDOhM=
=Nuwz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----