[Zope-CMF] Re: [CMF 2.1] FSPageTemplate & Unicode

[Philipp von Weitershausen]

Tres Seaver wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> On 8 Jan 2007, at 01:19, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>>> Right now I would let all existing CMF tools implement that interface,
>>>> so we would be on the safe side. In a later release we can revisit  
>>>> this
>>>> and see if some tools don't need Acquisition to work properly.
>>>>
>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should let us remove all the manual AQ- 
>>>> wrapping
>>>> again (sorry Jens for the premature patch) and thus impose no extra  
>>>> pain
>>>> on add-on developers.
>> The manual wrapping can be removed if we do use the special component  
>> registry which would do it for us, right. Having it done behind the  
>> scenes is obviously much better then trying to figure out if it's  
>> needed and then doing it manually. It's also the exact same behavior  
>> people got from getToolByName, so it's not really unexpected.
> 
> Even in Zope3, I think that "local" utilities may need to be local,
> meaning that they know the "place" in which they are registered.

No they don't. There's nothing implied for local utilities, not even 
persistence. Of course, many local utilities *are* persistent and stored 
in a folder somewhere, thus have a __parent__ and all that. But that's 
typically less of interest when *using* the utility.

> In Zope2, we *must* wrap them for the sake of security, if nothing else.

Sadly yes.


-- 
http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training
2nd edition of Web Component Development with Zope 3 is now shipping!