[Zope-CMF] [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?
Charlie Clark
charlie at begeistert.org
Sun Nov 16 10:32:15 EST 2008
Am 16.11.2008 um 16:17 schrieb yuppie:
> Questions: Is there a good reason why Plone doesn't register
> portal_setup as utility? Does the same reason apply to CMFDefault?
> Do we
> have to support registered and not registered portal_setup tools?
Does this relate to the discussions (earlier this year? last year?) on
which tools should be moved to utilities?
I fully support Jens' justification of the utility approach. Things
are a bit weird at the moment with some things still being tools and
others utilities but once I got used to the utility approach I found
it saner.
I don't think that we can support both approaches and if Plone needs a
wrapper around the utility with access to the request object then
surely that is something for Plone?
Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-938-5360
GSM: +49-178-782-6226
More information about the Zope-CMF
mailing list