[Zope-CMF] [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?

Jens Vagelpohl jens at dataflake.org
Sun Nov 16 17:05:31 EST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Nov 16, 2008, at 22:30 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously yuppie wrote:
>> I don't like to remove CMF's portal_setup registration *if* CMF  
>> itself
>> is not affected by this issue.
>
> Imho registering portal_setup as a utility as long as any CMF tool  
> uses
> self.REQUEST is problematic since it makes it impossible for
> import/export steps to use such tools.


I suggest we *look* at the current CMF situation before acting on the  
assumption that non-utility tools are used in (and break) CMF import/ 
export steps. It's been working fine so far.

jens



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkgmSsACgkQRAx5nvEhZLJxSACeJmQUFUNTjayJYLsSRIAolcpz
RZwAnjEu4F9Lc6IbTsklEkXpbKgHPfkI
=6vSX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Zope-CMF mailing list