[Zope-CMF] [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?
Jens Vagelpohl
jens at dataflake.org
Sun Nov 16 17:05:31 EST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 16, 2008, at 22:30 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously yuppie wrote:
>> I don't like to remove CMF's portal_setup registration *if* CMF
>> itself
>> is not affected by this issue.
>
> Imho registering portal_setup as a utility as long as any CMF tool
> uses
> self.REQUEST is problematic since it makes it impossible for
> import/export steps to use such tools.
I suggest we *look* at the current CMF situation before acting on the
assumption that non-utility tools are used in (and break) CMF import/
export steps. It's been working fine so far.
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkkgmSsACgkQRAx5nvEhZLJxSACeJmQUFUNTjayJYLsSRIAolcpz
RZwAnjEu4F9Lc6IbTsklEkXpbKgHPfkI
=6vSX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-CMF
mailing list