[Zope-CMF] CMF write performance as poor as Plone?

[Andreas Jung]

ooopss - wrong list :-)

On 24.11.2008 10:42 Uhr, Andreas Jung wrote:
> So weit bei mir nichts dazwischen kommt könnte ich ab 13h.
>
> Gruß,
> Andreas
>
> On 22.11.2008 15:39 Uhr, Charlie Clark wrote:
>> zop
>> Am 21.11.2008 um 07:31 schrieb Andreas Jung:
>>
>>> hmm....so why is CMF here nearly as bad a Plone. In Plone we know
>>> that everything is indexed various times (also in CMF I think) but
>>> Plone has much more indexes and metadata compared to CMF. A request
>>> in Plone goes through much more layers than in CMF....I am currently
>>> clueless interpreting the results. My current interpretation is: a
>>> custom CMF-based implementation of a CMS will be comparable slow/
>>> fast as an out-of-the-box solution?!
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF at lists.zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
>
> See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


-- 
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: info at zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535
Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lists.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/attachments/20081124/369a35ee/attachment.vcf