[Zope-CMF] [dev] add view traversal

[Jens Vagelpohl]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Sep 14, 2008, at 12:26 , yuppie wrote:
> This mail has been lying around for a while because I'm not sure it's
> the right way to start the discussion. But now I'll give it a try.  
> Maybe
> the sprinters find some time to discuss this:

We're down to 2 at this point and I need to take off very soon, so  
here's a very quick assessment from Tres and me:


> b) for URLs like http://www.example.org/guestbook/+/Message
>
> The '+' view already implements IPublishTraverse, so we can't change
> traversal using an adapter. The only solution I can see is to replace
> the '+' view by a customized version.

This looks like a good solution. I believe Zope 3 uses the same or a  
similar style.



> 3.) For which context should we register the add views?
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> The add views will depend on special portal type handling done by the
> traverser. So we register the add views for traverser?
>
> Or should all views have a default portal type that is used if we  
> access
> add views directly? In that case we would register the add view for  
> the
> container.

I'm not sure, hoping for comments from others.


> plone.dexterity[3] uses an @@add-dexterity-content traverser, but I
> don't think product names like dexterity or cmf should be visible in
> URLs. Those are implementation details that should be transparent  
> for users.

I agree.

jens



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjM7HQACgkQRAx5nvEhZLKPOACgpWQjPFL9o0Fng8WtLMSPRfSZ
3ZEAoJoWo0XGe00MXNwI2+aLmsYRxm6L
=Scef
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----