[Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

[Charlie Clark]

Hiya Laurence,

Am 06.09.2012, 14:46 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe <l at lrowe.co.uk>:

> I think the downsides from leaving it out are:

> * Another branch of five.localsitemanager to maintain.

> * Incompatibility between CMF 2.3 and Zope 4 once the parent pointer
> changes go in.

What's the timescale for that? I don't see a problem with 2.3 being tied  
to 2.13 and 2.4 being for > 2.13 which I assume Zope 4 is?
2.3 has a slew of changes throughout.

> Plone is unlikely to make a CMF upgrade until it removes its
> CMFDefault dependency.

Please elaborate.

> Laurence
> The main downside to leaving the changes out is the necessity of
> another five.localsitemanager branch to maintain. The changes are
> compatible with CMF 2.2, but it may not play nicely with the

Did you hit enter too early?

Charlie
-- 
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Kronenstr. 27a
Düsseldorf
D- 40217
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226