[Zope-Coders] Re: [ZC] 657/ 3 Reject "Reconcile Dup BTree Packages"

[Jeff Rush]

Actually, instead of rejection can we change it to

"add notes throughout lib/Components/BTree source
 tree that use is deprecated and will be removed
 at some point.  Note should also direct developers
 to use lib/python/BTrees instead."

I know people who, confused, are starting new
projects using that version of BTree.  With the
note they'd simply move on to the correct version.

(not sure who all these CCs are, especially the
bot-looking ones... hope they don't choke on replies.)

"Collector: Zope Bugs, Features, and Patches ..." wrote:
> 
> Issue #657 Update (Reject) "Reconcile Dup BTree Packages"
>  Status Rejected, Zope/bug+solution low
> To followup, visit:
>   http://collector.zope.org/Zope/657
> 
> ==============================================================
> = Reject - Entry #3 by stevea on Nov 20, 2002 11:46 am
> 
>  Status: Pending => Rejected
> 
> Chris' comment looks to me like a rejection of this issue.
> 
> ________________________________________
> = Comment - Entry #2 by mcdonc on Nov 2, 2002 9:38 pm
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> These BTree modules are not duplicates of one another... the BTrees package is the more recent of the two, but the other is required for backwards compatibility for now.
> 
> I suspect the old BTree module will not be removed for the lifetime of Zope 2.
> ________________________________________
> = Request - Entry #1 by Anonymous User on Nov 2, 2002 9:24 pm
> 
> Reconcile (and remove lesser duplicate) BTree modules:
> 
> lib/Components/BTree which produces:
>   BTree.so IIBTree.so IOBTree.so OIBTree.so intSet.so
> 
> lib/python/BTrees which produces:
>   _IIBTree.so _IOBTree.so _OIBTree.so _OOBTree.so
> 
> As a package maintainer, I'm seeking to simplify the
> building of Zope re unnecessary/confusing work.
> ==============================================================