[Zope-Coders] Re: revising layout of ZODB3 checkout
Tres Seaver
tseaver at zope.com
Tue Jan 20 10:22:14 EST 2004
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> It seems like there is consensus that a reorganization is a good thing.
> I realized that there's one more wrinkle.
>
> If I change the layout of the ZODB3 repolinks now, I'll affect all the
> maintenance branches. So we'd need to modify setup.py, MANIFEST, and
> probably a few other things for each of the maintenance branches. The
> resulting distributions would look different, too.
>
> Another option is to create a new top-level module, maybe call it ZODB,
> and use it for ZODB 3.3 and up. ZODB3 would linger just to support
> maintenance releases. Since there's no active work on ZODB4 planned, it
> doesn't seem like there's much harm in dropping the version number from
> the module name.
>
> Anyone have a preference?
I like the second, myself; the only real drag is how we arrange to
share the ,v files with Zope 2.8+, given that its directory structure is
tied to the old version.
Tres.
--
===============================================================
Tres Seaver tseaver at zope.com
Zope Corporation "Zope Dealers" http://www.zope.com
More information about the Zope-Coders
mailing list