[Zope-Coders] Re: ZConfig in SVN repository

[Andreas Jung]

--On Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 14:11 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters 
<tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote:

>> From my point of view it would make sense to replace the copies in the
>> 2.8 tree with external references for the next beta...any objections?
>
> People who think they understand those projects first need to make
> tags, so Zope 2.8 has something to point _to_.  Also, Zope, Zope3, and
> ZODB should all coordinate to make sure they're using the same tags
> for zdaemon and ZConfig.  Else, e.g., I develop ZODB using a ZConfig
> that doesn't match the one Zope uses, and then things break when Zope
> moves to a newer ZODB.

So am I right that you develop the ZODB already against two different 
ZConfig versions
(for Zope 2.8 and Zope 3)? So an unique ZConfig repository does make sense 
to you
 - of course only it is used by everyone. For me it would make perfect 
sense to get
rid of the local copies since it removes the need to maintain multiple 
copies.
@Jim: what's your opinion on this subject?

Andreas		
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-coders/attachments/20050512/8bfdc946/attachment.bin