Christian Theune wrote: > Please! > > >>If I do change it, any reason why I shouldn't change it on the 2.6, 2.7 and HEAD >>branches? > > > HEAD and 2.7 in any case. 2.6 ... I would be fine with it. Could be > declared as a bugfix as bare try:excepts: are bad anyway. Done on HEAD, 2.7 and 2.6 branches... cheers, Chris