[Zope-dev] Helping Digital Creations fix bugs - suggestions
Itamar Shtull-Trauring
itamars@ibm.net
Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:26:44 +0200
I just answered a question on the Zope list about a bug in Gadfly which
doesn't allow linebreaks. I was at least the second person to encounter
this bug - I got the answer from someone else. The solution is to delete
1(!) character. I submitted it to the Collector, and now it says:
Submitted: 2000/01/11
* * * This item is under review * * *
okay, there was a conference, and it's not so big a bug, but I get the
feeling nobody ever read the bug report, since fixing it takes 30 seconds at
the most. I doubt it'll be fixed until someone from DC find the bug
independently.
I know DC asked about this at the conference, but I think people who weren't
there might think of something too.
Some uggested solutions (from what DC promised/suggested or):
1. Hand out portions of Zope to outside people (stuff like load_site.py or
StructuredText comes to mind). I'd volunteer for load_site (proof of
competence will be presented once I check that my merge with CVS actually
works :).
and/or
Setup a (moderated?) mailing-list for each component devoted only to that
specific component and force ZComponent's maintainer to read it. I'm
thinking zope-zcatalog and zope-sql and zope-zpublisher, modeled after the
mozilla and ptk lists. How many patches sent to zope-dev or zope lists got
lost in the all the noise?
2. Change Collector so it has categories for stuff like Gadfly,
StructuredText - for every Zope component. Remove obsolete stuff like
ZTables. If I file a Gadfly bug, it should be emailed to the ZGadflyDA
maintainer.
Switch to Roundabout (http://www.lfw.org/python) when it's released?
Anybody else have suggestions?
--
Itamar S.T. itamars@ibm.net