[Zope-dev] LICENSE.txt: license has been certified as Open So
urce(tm)?
Michel Pelletier
michel@digicool.com
Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:47:04 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Blasum [mailto:holger@avendo.de]
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 5:58 AM
> To: zope-dev@zope.org
> Subject: [Zope-dev] LICENSE.txt: license has been certified as Open
> Source(tm)?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> zope is exciting. Closely before becoming too enamoured, let me ask
> a newbie question (possibly FAQ) for clarification on this (obvious)
> snippet...
>
> LICENSE.txt
>
> >Zope Public License (ZPL) Version 1.0
> >-------------------------------------
> >
> >Copyright (c) Digital Creations. All rights reserved.
> >
> >This license has been certified as Open Source(tm).
>
> (tm) - Uhh, well Open Source is not a trademark:
You're right.
> "``Open Source'' is not and cannot become a trademark."
> Eric S. Raymond, President, President Board of Directors, OSI
> (OSI had previously applied for it) 16 June 1999
> (http://www.opensource.org/press_releases/certified-open-source.html)
>
> But maybe this when LICENSE.txt was written in the dark ages where OSI
> still applied for that trademark, so perhaps it was intended to mean
> "certified by OSI" ?
The license was written in Jan/Feb of 1999, a few months before it was
determined that it was not a tm.
> Or whom or what has been the certifier mentioned in the
> license (I feel
> not sure whether par. 5 would pass very strict criteria, but on the
> other hand par. 7 alleviates it) ?
Bruce Perens (the other half of OSI) was our 'certifier'. Our license
should be corrected.
-Michel