[Zope-dev] Distributed ZODB-Transactions

Chris McDonough chrism@digicool.com
Thu, 18 May 2000 12:45:49 -0400


Well, that sort of makes sense.  The containing object is the object
that needs to be updated to rid itself of the reference to the contained
object.  I'm not sure I understand the problem.  The object to be
updated *is* the container.

>         My problem is the first step: how does the client recognize, which
> object has to be updated? In the case of a creation and deletion of an
> object, the transaction-class handles the parent object and not the object
> itself.

-- 
Chris McDonough
Digital Creations
Publishers of Zope - http://www.zope.org