[Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

[Chris McDonough]

It sounds like you've done more comprehensive speed testing than we have.
Can you share some numbers?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lalo Martins" <lalo@hackandroll.org>
To: <zope-dev@zope.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others


> On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 07:02:50AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > > Of course it would, for the same reasons as OracleStorage (eg
> > > FileStorage/Data.fs is inefficient)
> >
> > Actually, it's the other way around.  OracleStorage is 30-to-50 times
slower
> > than FileStorage on writes.  Reads are slow too but the slowness is
somewhat
> > negated by caching.
>
> Chris, that's only true for small databases. At about 100M of
> Data.fs, OracleStorage starts being faster. It depends on
> hardware too. We made some benchmarks on a major Brazilian
> portal, and well, it's currently running OracleStorage.
>
> Anyway, I said "inefficient", not "slow".
>
> []s,
>                                                |alo
>                                                +----
> --
>           Hack and Roll ( http://www.hackandroll.org )
>         The biggest site for whatever-it-is-that-we-are.
>
>
> http://zope.gf.com.br/lalo           mailto:lalo@hackandroll.org
>          pgp key: http://zope.gf.com.br/lalo/pessoal/pgp
>
> Brazil of Darkness (RPG)    ---     http://zope.gf.com.br/BroDar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
>
>