On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Matt Hamilton wrote: > Out of interest, is this startup time avoided when using BerkeleyDB as > the storage? I know that it has its own indexes etc. so I am > wondering if it no longer needs to load an index into memory. I'm not sure, but as I said in a previous oops-correcting-myself-mail it actually only uses 40 secs - FileStorage, that is.