[Zope-dev] Call Profiler
seb bacon
seb@jamkit.com
01 Feb 2002 10:53:11 +0000
> I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope
> announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise them :)
> ( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler/ for the impatient)
This is absolutely excellent, well done and thanks :) I added various FSObjects to the profiled modules list and have been looking at my CMF systems - it's really instructive.
> It does pose a question though: would it be better to have support for this
> stuff in the core, or is it OK for a product like this to dynamically patch
> the call methods when it needs to?
I see nothing wrong with it being a monkeypatch product. On the other
hand, it is a very useful tool, and as such could benefit from being in
the core simply so that it always gets maintained with the core.
> On one hand, the performance hit when dynamically patching the methods is
> zero when the product is not "active", but it does mean diddling with methods
> that really probably should be left alone. On the other hand, having changes
> to the core code to test for profiling being enabled introduces a small
> performance hit even when profiling is not activated.
You could do this check only if zope is being run in debug mode; then
there would be zero perormance hit in production sites.
>
> Any comments?
>
I think the reporting could do with some usability improvements. It's
good now, but takes a while to navigate round.
- All the reports could benefit from being sortable by column.
- the trace for a complete template could be slightly clearer. The
colour coding for the start and end of a module could have a clear
legend, for example.
- there needs to be some solution for really long URLs, which require
lots of horizontal scrolling - just displaying the final parts of the
path, with the rest of the url hidden somehow?
I can't think of exactly what else I would do to improve it right now,
though. And that's the kind of change I never get round to bothering
with, personally... Sorry these aren't really constructive ideas, but
you did ask for feedback :-)
seb