[Zope-dev] Last-modified and bobobase_modification_time
Steve Alexander
steve@cat-box.net
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:47:29 +0100
Wei He wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
>
>
>>>Would please go a little bit deeper giving an example what information
>>>HEAD requests don't pass to the server, although it's beyond this topic.
>>
>>HEAD requests are required to have no side effects. On the other hand
>>they are required to return the same response as GET requests without
>>the BODY.
>>So GET returning another last-modified header than HEAD would be in
>>violation of the RFC. This gets worse by the fact that HEAD can be used
>>for caching purposes.
>
>
> Totally understood. But the question is what RFC says about the
> last-modified header. Shouldn't it reflect the latest update? Zope is
> facing this problem because it handles the HEAD request seperately.
> Am I right?
>
> I don't see any need to seperately handle the HEAD request. My hacking of
> the last-modified header is done execpt that HEAD and wget -S returns
> different headers. I think the last step is to change the HEAD handling
> routine to the get information from GET. Does anyone have any idea?
If you *really* want to, you can run a HEAD just like a GET, but after
getting your last-modified and other details, abort the transaction to
undo side-effects, then return the HEAD response.
I would generally recommend against this, as it may end up being rather
expensive.
--
Steve Alexander