[Zope-dev] Cookie Crumbler and similar products (Re: Zope 2.6 project updated)

[Adrian Hungate]

As far as I can tell from my experiences at work, the answer is somewhere in
between. Yes it acts on all User Folders below the folder containing the CC,
but it seems to get a little confused if the DTML scripts (Or at least some
of them) are not in the same folder with each UF.

Not fully tested as I say, but it is annoying. Didn't there used to be a UF
with a checkbox "Use cookies" in it's properties. Can't this functionality
be added to the basic UF API, to extend all UF's rather than adding an
acquirable object that we might rather not acquire. Surely the nature of the
logon method should be governed by some or all of the following:
1) The site designers wishes.
2) The browsers ability to do Basic Auth properly (Or at all).
3) The users preference (This might be undesirable in some cases).

Adrian...

--
The difficulty of tactical maneuvering consists in turning the devious into
the direct, and misfortune into gain.
- Sun Tzu


----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Behrens" <matt.behrens@kohler.com>
To: "Christian Theune" <ct@gocept.com>
Cc: <zope-dev@zope.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Cookie Crumbler and similar products (Re: Zope 2.6
project updated)


> Christian Theune wrote:
>
> > Hmm. I didn't get an answer right now (well i don't find the question
again too)
> > if the cookie crumbler would interfere subfolders (distor through
acquisition)
> > or would only be active on a "sibling" userfolder, which he is
"watching".
>
> I'm really not sure.  I imagine it could be troublesome.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
>