[Zope-dev] 'not:' kludgey?!
Marc Lindahl
marc@bowery.com
Mon, 13 May 2002 10:16:08 -0400
on 5/10/02 11:32 AM, Chris Withers at chrisw@nipltd.com scrivened:
> Marc Lindahl wrote:
>>
>> Don't you have that now with the kludgey 'not' construct?
>
> What is kludgey about the 'not:' construct?!
For the reasons 'else' was invented in the first place, I guess: prone to
errors, inefficient, bulky. The biggest thing I see is: isn't linked to the
other construct, so it's prone to errors when editing the conditions.