[Zope-dev] robustness in management interface.
Romain Slootmaekers
romain@zzict.com
Fri, 07 Feb 2003 14:30:37 +0100
Jim Washington wrote:
> Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The zope management interface has some robustness problems:
>>
>> whenever you call manage_workspace (the normal way of managing a
>> folder through the HTML Zope management interface) on a folder X, and
>> some object y in that folder gives an error (fi, it has no title
>> attribute, ) the whole folder becomes unmanageble. The only thing you
>> can do at that point is to manually delete the problematic object by
>> typing:
>>
>> http://..../X/manage_delObjects?ids=y
>>
>> It seems to me that an object in a folder should not interfere with
>> the management of the folder (at least, you should be able to throw
>> the object out of the folder)
>>
>>
>> probably, a try/except or <dtml-try> in the right place fix this.
>
>
>
> Or, you could assure that your objects all have titles (at least ="") if
> you want them managed through the ZMI. I have not seen this as a
> *requirement*, but every example of a zope object I have seen uses
> self.title=aString in __init__().
> It is also important to have titles for most cataloging. Do you catalog
> your site? Is not title a good thing for searching? Might you catalog
> in the future?
>
maybe I didn't express myself as clearly as I could have:
the title attribute was an example (fi=for instance) of what can go wrong.
> Perhaps something for a BestPractices document(?) or wiki(?):
>
> "ZMI-manageable objects have a title attribute. This is a string."
>
> For a bit of context on the above, I put together a product that has
> title as a function (=[:30] of some content) some time ago. I have been
> led to understand that this was a bad idea because it breaks some
> cataloging.
>
yep.your catalog can be inconsistent, unless the changing of the
attribute will call a recatalog orso.
> Your idea of <dtml-try> does have merit IMHO. Should the ZMI really
> assume existence of anything other than "id" for objects?
>
Sloot.