Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

[Kapil Thangavelu]

On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:53, Jean-Francois.Doyon at CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Hmmm, well it's as stable as Ape and Subversion are respectively :)
> 
> I wouldn't call it stable no, it's something I did over the long week-end we
> just had, and that's about it :)
> 
> Ape is at 0.8 and therefore becoming quite mature, I'd have to let others
> speak as to it stability however ...
> 
> Subversion is also probably quite stable (It just reached 1.0), though I
> don't know how heavily tested it's been in a long running process (Might it
> have some memeory leaks ?) ...

the svn apache server model is a long running process and is fairly
stable on memory usage. the python bindings require doing some manual
memory management, but the pool api makes it easy to deallocate
arbitrary allocations safely. the cmfsvnbrowser code i ref'd early has
been in production by myself and others for almost a year and runs with
a stable memory footprint.

-kapil