Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

Jean-Francois.Doyon at CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca Jean-Francois.Doyon at CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca
Wed Apr 14 10:35:14 EDT 2004


Well there you go, perfect :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kapil Thangavelu [mailto:hazmat at objectrealms.net]
Sent: April 14, 2004 6:49 AM
To: Jean-Francois.Doyon at CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca
Cc: zope-dev at zope.org
Subject: RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)


On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:53, Jean-Francois.Doyon at CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Hmmm, well it's as stable as Ape and Subversion are respectively :)
> 
> I wouldn't call it stable no, it's something I did over the long week-end
we
> just had, and that's about it :)
> 
> Ape is at 0.8 and therefore becoming quite mature, I'd have to let others
> speak as to it stability however ...
> 
> Subversion is also probably quite stable (It just reached 1.0), though I
> don't know how heavily tested it's been in a long running process (Might
it
> have some memeory leaks ?) ...

the svn apache server model is a long running process and is fairly
stable on memory usage. the python bindings require doing some manual
memory management, but the pool api makes it easy to deallocate
arbitrary allocations safely. the cmfsvnbrowser code i ref'd early has
been in production by myself and others for almost a year and runs with
a stable memory footprint.

-kapil



More information about the Zope-Dev mailing list