[Zope3-dev], [Zope-dev] More arguments for "z" (was Re: Zope and zope)

[Fred Drake]

On Thursday 15 April 2004 10:23 am, Jim Fulton wrote:
 > (BTW, I think it was a mistake to have top-level persistent and
 > transaction packages. I think that will eventually come back to haunt us.)

I won't disagree with this.  ;-(

 > The only way to avoid collissions is to pick stupid names (zthis, zthat).
 > I much prefer z.this to zthis. This assumes that we can make it easy to
 > install z.this into z.

As long as z gets installed *at all* (before/after is not an issue), we can do 
this now.  This is supported, if only by accident, by the current 
implementation of distutils.

 > I think that that's a different discussion.  The safest thing to do
 > for now is to continue using a container package.

I like this as well.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fred at zope.com>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation